Monday, November 22, 2010

Distinctive patterns of brain activity?

Children with autism have distinctive patterns of brain activity

Researchers say they have identified a unique 'signature' of autism in the brains of children with the condition

  • guardian.co.uk,
  • Article history
  • Autism: Lone boy
    Children with autism had reduced activity in specific brain regions. Photograph: Corbis

    The pattern of brain activity in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is markedly different from that of children without the condition, according to a new brain-imaging study.

    The work, which shows that ASD has a "signature" in the brain, may lead to a better understanding of which parts of the brain the condition interferes with and how some people, despite having a high genetic risk of developing the condition, manage to compensate for its effects.

    ASD is a genetically influenced condition that affects the development of children's brains, with symptoms that include difficulties with social communication, interaction and imagination.

    Hundreds of genes may contribute to the condition and scientists believe that individual cases of ASD could correspond to different patterns of genetic variation, which could lead to measurable differences in the way that the brains of autistic children function.

    Dr Martha Kaiser and Professor Kevin Pelphrey of Yale University led a team of researchers that explored this idea by studying how children's brains responded to videos of people moving around them.

    "As intrinsically social creatures, humans typically exhibit robust visual sensitivity to other people's movements," they write today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    "This is well illustrated by the discovery that point-light displays (ie videos created by placing lights on the major joints of a person and filming them moving in the dark), although relatively impoverished stimuli, contain sufficient information to identify the kind of motion being produced (eg walking, dancing, reaching) as well as the identity of the agent."

    Previous research found that two-year-olds with autism did not turn to face point-light displays of "biological motion".

    In their study, Kaiser and Pelphrey placed 62 children aged from 4 to 17 years old into functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanners and monitored their brain activity as they watched a point-light display of biological motion and another of scrambled dots.

    In the group, 25 children had ASD, 20 were the siblings of children with ASD but did not display any symptoms themselves, and the remainder were "typically developing" children.

    The researchers identified three signatures of brain activity that corresponded to the different children's responses to the point-light displays.

    Relative to the other groups, there was reduced activity in specific brain regions in children with ASD when they were watching biological motion compared with scrambled motion.

    These included the right amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, areas which other research has identifed as having changed activity in adults with ASD.

    The researchers found additional brain regions that showed reduced activity in both the siblings group and the ASD group, relative to the typically developing group.

    They interpreted this result as a reflection of the underlying genetic vulnerability that the siblings group might have to ASD.

    The scientists also found what they called "compensatory activity" in the siblings group – brain regions that were working harder than normal and might be helping the children overcome their increased genetic risk of ASD.

    These included the right posterior temporal sulcus and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which have been implicated in social perception and social cognition.

    "These regions might reflect the absence of additional genetic or environmental factors that confer risk for ASD," the researchers wrote.

    "Alternatively, they could represent a process through which brain function was altered over development to compensate for an increased genetic risk to develop ASD."

    Dorothy Bishop, a professor of developmental neuropsychology at Oxford University, said: "This is a potentially interesting study that looks for brain markers of underlying abnormality in children with autism in response to viewing dot patterns that indicate biological motion."

    But she added: "More controversially, the authors also propose that other brain regions are under-responsive to biological motion in siblings of children with autism, as well as in those with autism.

    "Yet other regions are reported to be overactive in the siblings, and this is interpreted as compensatory activity.

    "Since these siblings had no subclinical symptoms of autism, and were selected to have no other relatives with any autistic features, they are unlikely to constitute a group with strong genetic risk for autism, and so this aspect of the results is puzzling and it would be important to replicate it in another sample."

    The researchers themselves admitted that further studies would be needed to determine the precise functions of the "compensatory" brain activity that they had identified.

    But if confirmed, they said, these could "represent important targets for treatments and provide a measure of the effectiveness of intervention, as well as a better understanding of the mechanisms through which successful treatments function".




Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/nov/15/children-autism-patterns-brain-activity

IQ and academic performance for students with autism

IQ scores can't predict academic performances of autistic kids


2010-11-18 16:40:00



A new research has revealed that many children with autism spectrum disorders are academically more capable than their IQ scores would suggest.

In a study by researchers at the University of Washington, 90 percent of autistic children showed a discrepancy between their IQ score and their performance on reading, spelling and math tests.

"Academic achievement is a potential source of self-worth and source of feeling of mastery that people may not have realized is available to children with autism," said Annette Estes, research assistant professor at the UW's Autism Center.

Thirty students with autism spectrum disorders, aged 9, were considered for their study.

IQ scores in the general population reliably predict academic performance - as measured by standardized tests for word reading, spelling and basic number skills. But results of the study showed something else.

"What we found was astounding: 27 out of the 30 children - that's 90 percent - had discrepancies between their IQ score and scores on at least one of the academic achievement tests," Estes said.

"Some scored higher and some scored lower than what their IQ score would predict," she added.

The discrepancies were especially profound in spelling and word reading, the researchers report.

They also found a link between social skills and academic ability in school. Specifically, children who had higher social skills at age 6, including introducing themselves to others and a willingness to compromise and cooperate, had better word reading skills at age 9.

Estes said that future study would concentrate on whether or not these trends hold true in the classroom.

The study is published online in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. (ANI)

Source: http://sify.com/news/iq-scores-can-t-predict-academic-performances-of-autistic-kids-news-international-klsqEqahacd.html

Sad story about a mother and her three kids

This is a very sad story that I have just read. CPS is all about making money and breaking the family. I just hope that there is an abrupt end to this and the family will be happier than ever once they are together.
==================

A mother's fight of her life (CPS and autism)

Tiffany86


The day my kids were taken was a day I wish I could erase from my memory. My heart never ached so bad as I cried a thousand tears. Cps is suppose to protect children and not rip them away from loving homes. Later, I would soon find out about the cps corruption happening all over the world. How it's not based on the "Childs best interest" but the money incentives they receive. They get bonuses for each child they adopt out and an extra 2k for a special needs child. It's sick. Don't believe me? Do the research as I did.

I have three beautiful children. My oldest is 3yrs old. His name is James and recently got diagnosed with Autism w/ Average intelligence. I have always loved and cared for my kids since the day they were born. I knew my son, James, was different when he turned 1yrs old. He was behind developmentally in many ways. People kept saying, "Oh..its because he is a boy. They are slower" even though I knew something was "off". I immediately had him connected with VMRC to receive services in regards to Therapy which included speech therapy (when old enough), physical therapy (as he didn't walk yet), and overall therapy. They came to the home once per week until he was 2 1/2. As the months passed he improved significantly. However, there was still something wrong I felt. He didn't look me in the eyes that much. He was not very sociable at daycare. He did not say one word even though I was very consistent with him. I was involved with every therapy session and even continued the therapy after they left. As he was my son who deserved the best. Recently, after all the years I fought and advocated for him..he was finally diagnosed with Autism and transferred to an agency that specialized in it. By the end of this month he will turn 3yrs old and be aged out of their program and transferred to the school district. Worried because he needs the continued services and everything that can possibly be offered to him so he could have the best start. Worried because he isn't in my care. Worried because I know the person he is with doesn't care about him nor is he capable of providing him with what he needs. And this is where my story begins..

A cps report was made on Aug 11th, 2010 that I "locked my kids in their bedroom". Granted that was true but it was never neglect! I tried to explain to the cps worker that my son had Autism and the behaviors associated with it. I told her that I only did it during naptime/bedtime to protect my son as he "wanders" during the night. I explained that it started when I woke up one night and heard my son crying. I jumped out of bed and found him standing in the bathtub filled with cold water. As a mother, I freaked out and had to make sure that would never happen again and he would be safe during the night. I tried the gates. They didn't work. He knew how to hop over them or push them down. I tried the safety locks on the door handles. Didn't work. He knew how to push them down to where they would pop off. He has figured out every safety lock and how to undo it. Some people say Autism is a disability but I think the opposite. Even though my son can't talk, he is extremely smart. He can do things kids his age can't do. Mind you, this cps worker was young herself, probably fresh out of college, and had no kids herself.

Before I even locked the bedroom I did my research first. I found on many valid Autism Websites where professionals even suggested to "lock the bedroom door" during bedtime to protect them and keep them safe during the night. To make it to where you have quick access to the room in case of a fire. After reading that, I started locking the door ONLY during bedtime. Before that, I had to turn the lock around to the outside because on one occasion my son locked himself in his room (he knows how to lock and unlock doors). It took me 30 min just to unlock the door from the outside and get in. That's when I turned the lock to the outside (but didn't start locking the door at that point).

They noticed the scratches on my daughters cheeks and asked where they came from. I told them my son did it. He did it not knowing it would hurt her as he doesn't understand "Cause and effect" but does it out of frustration because he can't talk and gets frustrated when he can't communicate (in any way) on what he wants or what upsets him. I told them that I put him in time-out (which never works) every time he did it and explained in short words what he did wrong and how he has to be nice. I kept doing time-outs as I don't spank my kids. I explained that he only did it to her under supervision. It wasn't all the time either. He had his "days" and other days he was perfectly fine. The daycare he went to prior (for a long time) had a problem with him recently on that because he kept hurting the other toddlers and making some of them bleed (scratches). Parents started to complain. But then they were trying to say that it was classified as a "failure to protect" when that doesn't make any sense. So every parent with an Autistic child can't have a non-autistic child in the same house? Because that's how they make it seem.

They told me to keep the door open and gate up. I did. Even though I knew what my son would do. It was hard for me to even go to bed, not knowing if my son would be safe during the night. But I felt I had to "Comply" with cps. They wanted "different" alternatives.

If you guys want a laugh here was a few suggestions she said.

1) "Why don't you just take the door handle off completely"

I just told her I did it to protect my son and keep him from wondering and getting hurt during the night, if not killed. So taking off the door handle completely? You want to make it easier for him where then he just "swings" the door open? Seriously.

2) "Why don't you just stack 2 gates on top of each other in the door frame"

I told her my son new how to hop over gates and push them down. So even if I stacked them (which would serve NO purpose, I couldn't do it because at the time I was 39 weeks pregnant and a single mom, and it would be virtually impossible because a pressure mounted gate needs a ground to stand on) And my son would just push the bottom gate down and crawl under the one that was on top. Again, didn't make sense.

3) "Why don't you just lock the bathroom"

I told her again that my son KNEW how to UNLOCK and LOCK doors so locking the bathroom door wouldn't be of any use because he would know how to unlock it. Besides, that's not my point! Its the whole house! Its the bathroom, my room, the kitchen, counters, sliding glass door, stove, oven, front door, etc. She wasn't getting the big picture and obviously at this point, I knew she had not been listening to anything I was saying from the beginning.

But, I did find a different alternative. I bought a gate that was tall enough to where he couldn't hop over and strong enough to where he couldn't push down. CASE SOLVED! I bought a door handle with no lock on either side. BOTH INSTALLED DURING THE INVESTIGATION! That's what they wanted!!! My whole purpose of the locked bedroom door was to ensure that my son was safe during the night. That's it. Since I have a gate now; there is no reason to lock the bedroom door.

Ok. So here comes the social worker and cps worker on the following day. The social worker with this big proposal on the "case plan".

The social worker stated, "Madeline wants to close the case but we want you to do these "services" under family maintenance" Note: They said they were strictly VOLUNTARY so I felt I had a say in the matter. They wanted me to take:

Parenting classes
Domestic Violence Assessment
Mental Health Assessment

I gave them reasons why I felt I didn't need their services. Valid ones if that.

I didn't need parenting classes as I have been taking parenting classes since 2007 voluntarily on a weekly basis. I started taking them after I gave birth to my oldest son as I was a new mother, a young mother, and felt taking parenting classes would only benefit me and my son.

I didn't need a mental health assessment because I just got one done and I have had a mental health caseworker since 2007.

I didn't need a domestic violence assessment because it wasn't a current issue and something that happened years ago.

The cps worker kept saying this was a "parenting issue" and I fired back with "No. It's a safety issue. Not a parenting issue. I was protecting my son!!!". Later, I would read in a report made to the courts that I kept "minimizing the issue". I didn't minimize anything. I just explained to them why I had to lock the bedroom door during bedtime, as suggested by professionals.

Did they bother to do the research? No. Did they bother to call people who actually knew me and what kind of mother I was? No. They didn't do anything.

The next day my sons therapist was with him in his room doing a therapy session and my daughter was taking a nap on my bed (since she couldn't be in her crib because that's where James was, doing his therapy session, and it was too loud in there). Then there was a knock on the door. 4 people were outside. One of them I noticed, which was the cps worker. She had papers in her hand. She basically said they were there because they were going to take my kids and put them into custody. Tears started streaming down my cheeks at that point. I looked behind me and saw my son laughing as he enjoyed an activity the therapist was doing with him. I asked why they were taking them as I complied with everything they asked (for the exception of the "case plan"). Her response was..

"Honey..you didn't comply with the services"

"You mean the parenting classes, etc?" I ask

"Yes" she replies

An attorney general was there also and said "Don't make this hard".

I can't even explain how hard it is to look your kids in the eyes and know they are going to be ripped from your arms. I had to "Gather" their clothes and some toys. I had to wake up my daughter and my sons' therapy session got interrupted. He had such a scared/confused look on his face and I just cried so hard. I held him so tight, not wanting to let go.

"Where is my son going?" I ask

"To his dads house" they reply

"No! You can't do that! His dad was never involved and never cared about him! He is a complete stranger to my son! You can't do that to him!"

"Well..he is the father" they reply

Did they care that Autistic children don't do well with change? Did they care how they need stability? Did they care how negatively this will affect my son as I am the only person he has known and loved. This is the only home he knows! They didn't even care that they were going to separate two siblings that loved each other so much. They didn't care that they were going to take away two kids that loved their mother so much and how I would die for them. My kids are my life. They are the air that I breath. This was just their "job" and obviously they didn't do it well. All they care about is that paycheck and not the kids.

My journey from that point out has been living HELL.

I was assigned a court appointed attorney that didn't do a damn thing to help my case! I cried so hard after doing my research about the corruption of cps..knowing that if I kept my court appointed attorney..I would never get my kids back. Found out that court appointed attorneys are actually "Friends" with cps. How they work "together".

A friend that I have, miraculously forked over the money (thousands) to pay for a private attorney for me. That was a miracle beyond anything.

Two weeks later, I gave birth to my son. Previously, I kept asking cps if they knew anything on if this one would be taken too. "I don't know" they reply. THEY ALL KNEW! You don't know yet you want me NOT to deliver at home? Yea..I'm not stupid. I had no choice. I had to deliver at the hospital because I had Step B and had to get antibiotics during labor so my son wouldn't get really ill after birth. My doctor had to induce me as I was almost 2 weeks post my EDD.

As always, when my son was born..I was so happy. Crying because he was so handsome and I loved him so much. I was currently grieving over the fact that my two kids got illegally taken from my home yet celebrating the birth of my son.

On the second day, his pediatrician came into my room. He said, "I tried to discharge you but an alert came up saying to "hold" the discharge until a social worker came and talked to me". Talked to me? Really? Is THAT what you guys call it? I waited for two hrs for him to come. I held my son for every minute. He came and basically said, "You have to sign this to give permission to put your son into custody"

"Why?" I ask. He has no relevancy to why my other two were taken (which there was a never a reason to why they were taken).

"Well..its because your other two recently got taken away and it wouldn't make sense for us to not take this one away"

he paused..for awhile..as I cried..

"Please sign this because if you don't..I'm going to have to call the cops"

(CPS is NOT to suppose to make threats and he did. This was another thing they violated along with many other laws they broke during this whole thing)

I just cried so hard. It was bad enough that my other two got taken..god..it was hell..still is. Now they were about to take this one too...for no valid reason at all.

All in all, they took him too.

Knowing this MIGHT happen..and knowing how bad foster homes can be..I pre-planned the placement. My friend, whom I have known for years, recently got finger printed, etc and was approved to take care of my daughter (until I get them back) and she was willing to take care of my newest son as she wanted (my friend) to keep them together and so he wouldn't end up in a foster home. So..two of my kids..are with my friend as my oldest (the one who has Autism) is with a dad that was never involved and never cared.

Visits with my son are horrible. Not the actual visit but how I sit in the waiting room and I have to watch his dad, his dad's gf, and my son sit right in front of me. I have to sit there and watch what my sons dad does to him right before my eyes. How when my son tries to play with the toys in the waiting room..he holds him by the arm at all times (near the shoulder). I just want to yell, "LET HIM GO!" god. He can't even play freely? My son just wanted to play with toys and he wouldn't let him. My son wanted to come toward me and he forced him back and restrained him on his lap while my son cried. How on another occasion I had my daughter with me in the waiting area (my friend met me in the parking lot so I walked in with them). My daughter recognized my son. She misses him so much. She wanted to go up to him to play. However, his dad wouldn't let go of him. "Not now, James". He is the one that needs parenting classes! He forced him back again. On a recent visit I had with my son, I led him out to the waiting room as that's where his "Dad" was waiting. I bent down to his level and told him how much I loved him and that I will see him next week. He kissed me on the cheek. The hardest thing was to let go of his hand knowing he he going back to a person that doesn't care for him or love him and having no say in the matter. My son ran to the left (opposite of where his dad was..he was running away from him) and his dad forced him back. It just kills me. My son also has eczema. Had it since he was 2 months old. Its not hard to treat! All you do is put hydrocordizone cream on it and Aveeno Baby lotion as it has oatmeal in it. Yet, at visits..I see scabs on his ankles/legs. That happens when excema isn't properly treated. Or in this case, not treated at all. I know how bad he can itch and be in pain because of it. I know that his dad isn't doing anything about it either.

The biggest thing that brings me to tears is seeing my son regressing. He used to be so happy, active, energetic, and was so outspoken (even though he couldn't talk..he babbled to no end). Now..He is so quiet, doesn't laugh, barely smiles, and keeps to himself. I look at him and I don't see the son I have raised and loved. When you look in his eyes its like looking into a dark hole. Cps noticed and said, "Oh its probably because of his diagnosis" YOU guys don't know ANYTHING about his diagnosis. If you did, they would have not been taken! The way he is now is because you placed him in a home and with people he doesn't know and who don't care about him!

My sons dad isn't "right" in the head either. All he does is play video goes, has a mental capacity of a 6th grader, wiccan, etc. Even cps is catching on to this.

There is SOOO much more to this and I really want to do a Part 2 to my story.

All in all, my kids should have never been taken. I never neglected them and only protected my son. I will fight this until my kids come home. I will bring this to the media even.

I even called the executive director at an agency that specializes in Autism and told her my story. I told her about the "locked bedroom door" and how cps classified that as "neglect". She was floored! She said that was in no way neglect. How there had to be SOMETHING ELSE on the report. I said, "no! That's the main staple!". "Well..they can't do that! That is a safety measure many parents have to take to protect their Autistic kids from wondering" she says. "Well..they did..and now I have to defend this in court" I reply. She is on the list of people that are going to be subpoenaed to testify.

Source: http://www.autismsupportnetwork.com/news/mothers-fight-her-life-cps-and-autism-28893201#ixzz1621qL9SG

http://www.autismsupportnetwork.com/news/mothers-fight-her-life-cps-and-autism-28893201

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Cognition in Children with Autism can Improve

Children with autism can improve cognition

Published: Sept. 18, 2010 at 12:02 AM

LONDON, Sept. 18 (UPI) -- Children with autism vary in cognitive skills but they often improve over time, Australian and British researchers say.

Study leader Elizabeth Pellicano of the Institute of Education in London says people with autism spectrum disorders are thought to have a "profile of cognitive strengths and weaknesses."

These include problems appreciating the thoughts and feelings of others, "executive function" difficulties with control and planning, and an ability to perceive parts or small details. However, she says, few studies have tracked these skills over a period of years.

"What we know a lot less about is how the cognitive skills of children with autism spectrum disorders change over time," Pellicano says in a statement. "In this study, we found that these skills vary from child to child and also that some of them can improve over time."

The study, published in Child Development, finds children's skills in each of the three areas improved considerably during the study's three years. Most of the children had more appreciation of others' thoughts and feelings and were better able to plan, regulate, and control their thoughts and actions.

Pellicano and colleagues assessed 37 children with autism spectrum disorders and 31 typically developing children at age 5 and 6 and again three years later.

Source: http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2010/09/18/Children-with-autism-can-improve-cognition/UPI-51871284782540/


Thursday, September 16, 2010

Are we there yet?

Autism in some boys linked to missing DNA

Wed Sep 15, 3:54 PM

By Sheryl Ubelacker, Health Reporter, The Canadian Press

TORONTO - Researchers are a step closer to understanding why autism spectrum disorder affects four times as many boys as girls.

A study led by a team of Toronto scientists has discovered that males who carry specific genetic alterations on their X-chromosome have an elevated risk for developing autism spectrum disorder, or ASD.

“The male gender bias in autism has intrigued us for years and now we have an indicator that starts to explain why this may be,” said co-principal investigator Stephen Scherer, director of the Centre for Applied Genomics at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children.

The researchers, whose work is published this week in the journal Science Translational Medicine, found that about one per cent of boys with ASD had mutations related to the PTCHD1 gene on the X-chromosome.

"Hearing that it's in one per cent doesn't get a lot of people excited," conceded Scherer. "But it gets geneticists really excited because there's a lot of genes involved (in ASD)."

Boys inherit one X-chromosome from their mother and one Y-chromosome from their father, explained Scherer. "If a boy's X-chromosome is missing the PTCHD1 gene or other nearby DNA sequences, they will be at high risk of developing ASD or intellectual disability."

"Girls are different in that, even if they are missing one PTCHD1 gene, by nature they always carry a second X-chromosome, shielding them from ASD. While these women are protected, autism could appear in future generations of boys in their families."

ASD affects one in every 120 children — including one in 70 boys. The neurological disorder ranges in severity, but can cause difficulties with communication and interaction with others, unusual patterns of behaviour and intellectual disability.

An estimated 190,000 Canadians have the disorder, which is on the rise worldwide, says Autism Society Canada.

The isolation of genetic alterations on the X-chromosome within a percentage of individuals with autism follows a number of recent genetic discoveries by Scherer and others that are moving science slowly but surely towards a better understanding of the causes of the baffling disorder.

To conduct this study, researchers analyzed the gene sequences of 2,000 individuals with ASD, along with others with an intellectual disability, and compared the results to DNA sequencing for thousands of healthy control subjects.

While the PTCHD1 mutation occurred in one per cent of males with ASD, it was not present in the DNA of thousands of healthy male controls — and sisters of affected males carrying the same mutation seemed unaffected.

"I don't think it's too surprising that there is another gene on the X-chromosome that is involved in autism," said co-principal researcher John Vincent, head of the molecular neuropsychiatry and development lab at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.

"It's another one in the list and I think it will be one of the most common ones, so parents will be able to have their children tested," said Vincent. "Particularly if they have a son affected, it will be important for them to know if it's caused by a mutation at or around PTCHD1."

"And if it is, they'll know that future (male) children would be at risk."

The scientists believe the PTCHD1 gene has a role in a neurobiological pathway that delivers information to cells during brain development, and this specific mutation could disrupt crucial processes and contribute to the onset of autism, said Vincent.

Having a test for the genetic mutation would mean children could be diagnosed at a younger age, allowing behavioural therapies to be started sooner, he said. "So the earlier you can catch it, the more effective the therapies can be."


Source: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100915/national/autism_boys_genetics_1



Wednesday, September 15, 2010

This is what is happening to students with autism in many Florida public schools

Parents: Ban schools from restraining students with autism, other disabilities


By Laura Green

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Updated: 10:32 p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010

Posted: 8:01 p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010

— For a third straight year, Florida parents and special-education advocates are trying to get a law passed that would prevent school employees from holding students with disabilities face-down or shutting them in rooms to try to control behaviors associated with their conditions.

This year, proponents have the backing of the National Autism Association, Autism Speaks and 26 state organizations, primarily involved in medical or disabilities issues.

There's also a federal push to limit the use of such practices after a U.S. Government Accountability Office report revealed hundreds of cases of alleged abuse and several children killed when school and treatment center staffers used the methods.

"These are not isolated incidents," state Rep. Dorothy Hukill, the bill's sponsor, said during a news conference today in Tallahassee.

Hukill, R-Port Orange, invited several parents, including Boynton Beach mom Phyllis Musumeci, to tell their stories.

Musumeci fought to get the Palm Beach County school district to agree to document each occasion in which a staff member restrained a child after she discovered that her son had been held down at least 80 times.

Musumeci said she missed the warning signs that her son had been traumatized. He fought going to school, didn't want to be touched and even stopped doing things he used to like, such as playing on his computer. Now her son is attending a private school for special education students because he can't function in a district school.

"This bill will keep our children safe," she said. "It's been five years and my son is still suffering."

To help make their case, supporters of the bill (HB 81 ) have a grainy video of a 14-year-old autistic boy from Citrus County who was dragged on his hands and knees and thrown into a dark room by his teacher and an aide last school year. When he tried to get out of the room, the teacher slammed the door shut on his hand, leaving him in the room with a bleeding and broken finger.

The video does not show any violence on the part of the boy that precipitated the incident.

The boy's father had been asking the staff why his son had repeatedly come home from school with torn pants. It wasn't until the broken finger that Vikas Kamat found out what was really happening to his son at school.

The state Department of Children and Families found that excessive force was used, and Department of Education said the school was in "noncompliance" regarding use of seclusion.

"It is not about blaming anybody anymore," said Kamat. "If we all look the other way and we have evidence as sick as this, what is left of us? What is left of us as human beings?"

The bill has failed in previous years, in part because of opposition from school officials who say such practices can be done safely and are needed to keep children from hurting themselves or others.

Hukill said she expects to face opposition from districts again this year.

While the bill would prohibit the use of facedown holds, which have caused children to suffocate, it would still allow school staff members to physically immobilize students whose behavior creates an immediate danger to themselves or others.

Some special-needs children have trouble controlling their behavior and can become violent, acknowledged Mark Kamleiter, the special education lawyer who represents the Kamat family.

But Kamleiter, who worked as a special education teacher and behavior specialist in the Pinellas County school system for five years, said there is almost always another way to teach children to control themselves instead of restraining them or locking them in a room.

"If schools cannot use that kind of punishment to deal with the behaviors, my hope is they will train people to appropriately deal with those behaviors," he said.

The bill focuses on staff training and informing parents in instances when staff members have to handle a child to keep them from hurting themselves or someone else.

Florida is among 19 states with no laws or regulations governing the use of restraint or seclusion.

Staff writer Michael C. Bender contributed to this story.


(Source: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/schools/parents-ban-schools-from-restraining-students-with-autism-177665.html)

Friday, September 3, 2010

AX got some marks from school again

As aforementioned, the principal called us since AX was having a tough time due to the bus drill. Well, when I picked him up yesterday at 2:35PM EST, I noticed that his left ear has marks. One can not leave marks in the ears unless they pinched him so hard by the ear. I asked the aide why he has a mark on his left ear and she said that she had not noticed it. I just dismissed it since we are also concerned how he is doing academically. When we arrived home after we ate at Taco Bell and had fun at the playground, I asked him to change his shirt because he was sweating. I noticed that he had marks again especially at the back.

I do not understand what the fuck is safety of the personnel and other students when AX is getting marks. We were told by the principal that he was being dealt with by five adults. I questioned her why would there be a need for five adults. She said, that she is fearing safety if there is only one adult with AX.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

-Empty- Regular Classroom

I hope they did not put AX here. We were called by the principal this morning that AX was having problems again. She told us over the phone that they put AX in an empty regular classroom. This is what I am reminded of "an empty, regular classroom."

I was told yesterday that AX had a problem and it was not until 11AM or so that he was able to do academic work. What the heck did he do in the past 3 hours in school. He never had a tantrum that lasted 3 hours. If he had a tantrum, the most the he can have is 30 minutes.

=================


MURRAYVILLE, Georgia (CNN) -- A few weeks before 13-year-old Jonathan King killed himself, he told his parents that his teachers had put him in "time-out."

The room where Jonathan King hanged himself is shown after his death. It is no longer used, a school official said.

The room where Jonathan King hanged himself is shown after his death. It is no longer used, a school official said.

Click to view previous image
1 of 3
Click to view next image

"We thought that meant go sit in the corner and be quiet for a few minutes," Tina King said, tears washing her face as she remembered the child she called "our baby ... a good kid."

But time-out in the boy's north Georgia special education school was spent in something akin to a prison cell -- a concrete room latched from the outside, its tiny window obscured by a piece of paper.

Called a seclusion room, it's where in November 2004, Jonathan hanged himself with a cord a teacher gave him to hold up his pants. Video Watch Jonathan's parents on their son's death »

An attorney representing the school has denied any wrongdoing.

Seclusion rooms, sometimes called time-out rooms, are used across the nation, generally for special needs children. Critics say that along with the death of Jonathan, many mentally disabled and autistic children have been injured or traumatized.

Few states have laws on using seclusion rooms, though 24 states have written guidelines, according to a 2007 study conducted by a Clemson University researcher.

Texas, which was included in that study, has stopped using seclusion and restraint. Georgia has just begun to draft guidelines, four years after Jonathan's death.

Based on conversations with officials in 22 states with written guidelines, seclusion is intended as a last resort when other attempts to calm a child have failed or when a student is hurting himself or others.

Michigan requires that a child held in seclusion have constant supervision from an instructor trained specifically in special education, and that confinement not exceed 15 minutes.

Connecticut education spokesman Tom Murphy said "time-out rooms" were used sparingly and were "usually small rooms with padding on the walls."

Only Vermont tracks how many children are kept in seclusion from year to year, though two other states, Minnesota and New Mexico, say they have been using the rooms less frequently in recent years.

Dr. Veronica Garcia, New Mexico's education secretary, said her state had found more sophisticated and better ways to solve behavior problems. Garcia, whose brother is autistic, said, "The idea of confining a child in a room repeatedly and as punishment, that's an ethics violation I would never tolerate."

But researchers say that the rooms, in some cases, are being misused and that children are suffering.

Public schools in the United States are now educating more than half a million more students with disabilities than they did a decade ago, according to the National Education Association.

"Teachers aren't trained to handle that," said Dr. Roger Pierangelo, executive director of the National Association of Special Education Teachers.

"When you have an out-of-control student threatening your class -- it's not right and it can be very damaging -- but seclusion is used as a 'quick fix' in many cases."

Former Rhode Island special education superintendent Leslie Ryan told CNN that she thought she was helping a disabled fifth-grader by keeping him in a "chill room" in the basement of a public elementary school that was later deemed a fire hazard.

"All I know is I tried to help this boy, and I had very few options," Ryan said. After the public learned of the room, she resigned from her post with the department but remains with the school.

School records do not indicate why Jonathan King was repeatedly confined to the concrete room or what, if any, positive outcome was expected.

His parents say they don't recognize the boy described in records as one who liked to kick and punch his classmates. They have launched a wrongful death lawsuit against the school -- the Alpine Program in Gainesville -- which has denied any wrongdoing. A Georgia judge is expected to rule soon on whether the case can be brought before a jury.

Jonathan's parents say the boy had been diagnosed since kindergarten with severe depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. But his father remembers him as a boy who was happy when he sang in the church choir.

"He was a hugger, liked to go fishing with me and run after me saying, 'Daddy, when are we going to the lake?' " Don King said.

King said that he wanted to know if there were similar situations in other schools and that critics of seclusion rooms fear there could be.

"Jonathan's case is the worst of the worst, but it should be a warning. It's reasonable to think that it could happen in all the other schools that use seclusion on disabled children -- largely because the use of seclusion goes so unchecked," said Jane Hudson, an attorney with the National Disability Rights Network.

"This is one of those most unregulated, unresearched areas I've come across," said Joseph Ryan, a Clemson University special education researcher who has worked in schools for disabled kids and co-authored a study on the use of seclusion.

"You have very little oversight in schools of these rooms -- first because the general public doesn't really even know they exist," he said.

There is no national database tracking seclusion incidents in schools, though many have been described in media reports, lawsuits, disability advocacy groups' investigations and on blogs catering to parents who say their child had been held in seclusion.

Disability Rights California, a federally funded watchdog group, found that teachers dragged children into seclusion rooms they could not leave. In one case, they found a retarded 8-year-old had been locked alone in a seclusion room in a northeast California elementary school for at least 31 days in a year.

"What we found outrageous was that we went to the schools and asked to see the rooms and were denied," said Leslie Morrison, a psychiatric nurse and attorney who led the 2007 investigation that substantiated at least six cases of abuse involving seclusion in public schools.

"It took a lot of fighting to eventually get in to see where these children were held."

CNN asked every school official interviewed if a reporter could visit a seclusion room and was denied every time.

In other instances of alleged abuse:

• A Tennessee mother alleged in a federal suit against the Learn Center in Clinton that her 51-pound 9-year-old autistic son was bruised when school instructors used their body weight on his legs and torso to hold him down before putting him in a "quiet room" for four hours. Principal Gary Houck of the Learn Center, which serves disabled children, said lawyers have advised him not to discuss the case.

• Eight-year-old Isabel Loeffler, who has autism, was held down by her teachers and confined in a storage closet where she pulled out her hair and wet her pants at her Dallas County, Iowa, elementary school. Last year, a judge found that the school had violated the girl's rights. "What we're talking about is trauma," said her father, Doug Loeffler. "She spent hours in wet clothes, crying to be let out." Waukee school district attorney Matt Novak told CNN that the school has denied any wrongdoing.

• A mentally retarded 14-year-old in Killeen, Texas, died from his teachers pressing on his chest in an effort to restrain him in 2001. Texas passed a law to limit both restraint and seclusion in schools because the two methods are often used together.

Federal law requires that schools develop behavioral plans for students with disabilities. These plans are supposed to explicitly explain behavior problems and methods the teacher is allowed to use to stop it, including using music to calm a child or allowing a student to take a break from schoolwork.

A behavioral plan for Jonathan King, provided to CNN by the Kings' attorney, shows that Jonathan was confined in the seclusion room on 15 separate days for infractions ranging from cursing and threatening other students to physically striking classmates.

Howard "Sandy" Addis, the director of the Pioneer education agency which oversees Alpine, said that the room where Jonathan died is no longer in use. Citing the ongoing litigation, he declined to answer questions about the King case but defended the use of seclusion for "an emergency safety situation."

The Alpine Program's attorney, Phil Hartley, said Jonathan's actions leading up to his suicide did not suggest the boy was "serious" about killing himself. Jonathan's actions were an "effort to get attention," Hartley said.

"This is a program designed for students with severe emotional disabilities and problems," he said. "It is a program which frequently deals with students who use various methods of getting attention, avoiding work."

A substitute employee placed in charge of watching the room on the day Jonathan died said in an affidavit that he had no training in the use of seclusion, and didn't know Jonathan had threatened suicide weeks earlier.

advertisement

The Kings say they would have removed their son from the school if they knew he was being held in seclusion, or that he had expressed a desire to hurt himself.

"We would have home schooled him or taken him to another psychologist," said Don King. "If we would have known, our boy would have never been in that room. He would still be alive."

(Source: http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/17/seclusion.rooms/)

Monday, February 1, 2010

Yay division!

AX is pretty much done with multiplication. He knows double-digit multiplication. I wished that I could introduce him to division last December 2009 but so many things got in the way. Nonetheless, I taught him division in the 3rd week of January 2010. He got it fast right after I thought him using sticks to segregate in order to come up with an answer.

He was introduced by his mainstream teacher to Geography. In fact, he will have this 4th time to take the test of eastern states of the US. At the moment, he is done with 15 states and their capitals. He also takes multiplication table test every Friday.

Creeping days

It is the first day of February 2010 and I happen to visit my blog after posting a news story that I did not realize I posted. The year entered a little less on the financial side but also less in spending which is darn good. It was also a year of thinking about what will happen to us tomorrow and the coming days. January was filled with so much wishing and worrying. Yes, we should have not done it but you can not really help it. Papi is getting fed up with his work and that's it. He wants to fly this time around. I am not trying to clip his wings but I always tell him to wait a bit and when that time comes, we will surely fly anywhere with so much determination.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

More Evidence That Autism Is a Brain 'Connectivity' Disorder

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100110151333.htm

ScienceDaily (Jan. 11, 2010) — Studying a rare disorder known as tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), researchers at Children's Hospital Boston add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that autism spectrum disorders, which affect 25 to 50 percent of TSC patients, result from a miswiring of connections in the developing brain, leading to improper information flow. The finding may also help explain why many people with TSC have seizures and intellectual disabilities.

Findings were published online in Nature Neuroscience on January 10.

TSC causes benign tumors throughout the body, including the brain. But patients with TSC may have autism, epilepsy or intellectual disabilities even in the absence of these growths. Now, researchers led by Mustafa Sahin, MD, PhD, of Children's Department of Neurology, provide evidence that mutations in one of the TSC's causative genes, known as TSC2, prevent growing nerve fibers (axons) from finding their proper destinations in the developing brain.

Studying a well-characterized axon route -- between the eye's retina and the visual area of the brain -- Sahin and colleagues showed that when mouse neurons were deficient in TSC2, their axons failed to land in the right places. Further investigation showed that the axons' tips, known as "growth cones," did not respond to navigation cues from a group of molecules called ephrins. "Normally ephrins cause growth cones to collapse in neurons, but in tuberous sclerosis the axons don't heed these repulsive cues, so keep growing," says Sahin, the study's senior investigator.

Additional experiments indicated that the loss of responsiveness to ephrin signals resulted from activation of a molecular pathway called mTOR, whose activity increased when neurons were deficient in TSC2. Axon tracing in the mice showed that many axons originating in the retina were not mapping to the expected part of the brain.

Although the study looked only at retinal connections to the brain, the researchers believe their findings may have general relevance for the organization of the developing brain. Scientists speculate that in autism, wiring may be abnormal in the areas of the brain involved in social cognition.

"People have started to look at autism as a developmental disconnection syndrome -- there are either too many connections or too few connections between different parts of the brain," says Sahin. "In the mouse models, we're seeing an exuberance of connections, consistent with the idea that autism may involve a sensory overload, and/or a lack of filtering of information."

Sahin hopes that the brain's miswiring can be corrected by drugs targeting the molecular pathways that cause it. The mTOR pathway is emerging as central to various kinds of axon abnormalities, and drugs inhibiting mTOR has already been approved by the FDA. For example, one mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, is currently used mainly to prevent organ rejection in transplant patients, and Sahin plans to launch a clinical trial of a rapamycin-like drug in approximately 50 patients with TSC later this year, to see if the drug improves neurocognition, autism and seizures.

In 2008, Sahin and colleagues published related research in Genes & Development showing that when TSC1 and TSC2 are inactivated, brain cells grow more than one axon -- an abnormal configuration that exacerbates abnormal brain connectivity. The mTOR pathway was, again, shown to be involved, and when it was inhibited with rapamycin, neurons grew normally, sprouting just one axon.

Supporting the mouse data, a study by Sahin and his colleague Simon Warfield, PhD, in the Computational Radiology Laboratory at Children's, examined the brains of 10 patients with TSC, 7 of whom also had autism or developmental delay, and 6 unaffected controls. Using an advanced kind of MRI imaging called diffusion tensor imaging, they documented disorganized and structurally abnormal tracts of axons in the TSC group, particularly in the visual and social cognition areas of the brain (see image). The axons also were poorly myelinated -- their fatty coating, which helps axons conduct electrical signals, was compromised. (In other studies, done in collaboration with David Kwiatkowski at Brigham and Women's Hospital, giving rapamycin normalized myelination in mice.)

Sahin has also been studying additional genes previously found to be deleted or duplicated in patients with autism, and finding that deletion of some of them causes neurons to produce multiple axons -- an abnormality that, again, appears to be reversed with rapamycin.

"Many of the genes implicated in autism may possibly converge on a few common pathways controlling the wiring of nerve cells," says Sahin. "Rare genetic disorders like TSC are providing us with vital clues about brain mechanisms leading to autism spectrum disorders. Understanding the neurobiology of these disorders is likely to lead to new treatment options not only for TSC patients, but also for patients with other neurodevelopmental diseases caused by defective myelination and connectivity, such as autism, epilepsy and intellectual disability."

The current study was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the John Merck Scholars Fund, Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance, the Manton Foundation, the Children's Hospital Boston Translational Research Program, and the Children's Hospital Boston Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Center.

Duyu Nie was first author on the paper. Coauthors were Duyu Nie, Alessia Di Nardo, Juliette M Han, Hasani Baharanyi, Ioannis Kramvis, and ThanhThao Huynh, all of the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center and Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital Boston; Sandra Dabora of Brigham and Women's Hospital; Simone Codeluppi and Elena B Pasquale of the Burnham Institute for Medical Research, and University of California San Diego; and Pier Paolo Pandolfi of Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center.

Story Source:
Adapted from materials provided by Children's Hospital Boston, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Journal Reference:

  1. Duyu Nie et al. Tsc2-Rheb signaling regulates EphA-mediated axon guidance. Nature Neuroscience, January 10, 2010
APA

MLA
Children's Hospital Boston (2010, January 11). More evidence that autism is a brain 'connectivity' disorder. ScienceDaily. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2010/01/100110151333.htm

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

New Imaging Technique Discovers Differences In Brains Of People With Autism

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061023192716.htm

New Imaging Technique Discovers Differences In Brains Of People With Autism

ScienceDaily (Oct. 24, 2006) — Using a new form of brain imaging known as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), researchers in the Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging at Carnegie Mellon University have discovered that the so-called white matter in the brains of people with autism has lower structural integrity than in the brains of normal individuals. This provides further evidence that the anatomical differences characterizing the brains of people with autism are related to the way those brains process information.

The results of this latest study were published in the journal NeuroReport. The scientists used DTI — which tracks the movement of water through brain tissue — to measure the structural integrity of the white matter that acts as cables to wire the parts of the brain together. Normally, water molecules move, or diffuse, in a direction parallel to the orientation of the nerve fibers of the white matter. They're aided by the coherent structure of the fibers and a process called myelination, in which a sheath is formed around the fibers that speeds nerve impulses. The movement of water is more dispersed if the structural integrity of the tissue is low — i.e., if the fibers are less dense, less coherently organized, or less myelinated — as it was with the participants with autism in the Carnegie Mellon study. Researchers found this dispersed pattern particularly in areas in and around the corpus callosum, the large band of nerve fibers that connects the two hemispheres of the brain.

"These reductions in white matter integrity may underlie the behavioral pattern observed in autism of narrowly focused thought and weak coherence of different streams of thought," said Marcel Just, director of the Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging and a co-author of the latest study. "The new findings also provide supporting evidence for a new theory of autism that attributes the disorder to underconnectivity among brain regions," Just said.

In 2004, Just and his colleagues proposed the underconnectivity theory based on a groundbreaking study in which they discovered abnormalities in the white matter that suggested a lack of coordination among brain areas in people with autism. This theory helps explain a paradox of autism: Some people with autism have normal or even superior skills in some areas, while many other types of thinking are disordered.

Last summer, Just led a team of researchers that found for the first time that the abnormality in synchronization among brain areas is related to the abnormality in the white matter. They discovered that key portions of the corpus callosum seem to play a role in the limitation on synchronization. In people with autism, anatomical connectivity — based on the size of the white matter — was found to be positively correlated with functional connectivity, which is the synchronization of the active brain regions. They also found that the functional connectivity was lower in those participants in whom the autism was more severe.

These studies, along with the latest paper, are providing a comprehensive picture of the autistic brain, whose components operate with less coordination than is normally the case, and which is less reliant on frontal components and more reliant on posterior components. The latest DTI finding shows that some of the frontal-posterior communication fiber tracts are abnormal, consistent with the lower degree of frontal-posterior coordination.

"The brain components in autism function more like a jam session and less like a symphony," Just said.

The latest study was co-authored by Rajesh K. Kana and Timothy A. Keller of the Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging. This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Story Source:

Adapted from materials provided by Carnegie Mellon University.

APA

MLA
Carnegie Mellon University (2006, October 24). New Imaging Technique Discovers Differences In Brains Of People With Autism. ScienceDaily. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2006/10/061023192716.htm

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.