When it comes to treating autism, there are still more questions than answers.
That’s the message from a series of reviews published today in the journal Pediatrics, in which researchers analyzed past studies on the effectiveness of medication or behavioral and developmental therapies in kids with autism spectrum disorders.
Parents, doctors, and even entire school systems are “routinely put in the position of having to make decisions about what the most appropriate services will be” for kids with autism, said Zachary Warren, one of the researchers, in an interview with Reuters Health.
“What we would really hope for is an evidence base where you could make those decisions based on what we know about how particular children respond to particular interventions,” said Warren, who runs an autism clinic at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn.
But for most treatment options, there is not convincing evidence that they actually help kids get better, Warren said.
Close to 1 percent of children in the United States have an autism spectrum disorder, which includes both autism and Asperger’s syndrome. People with these conditions have difficulty interacting with and understanding the emotions of others, and they often engage in repetitive behaviors.
Most children with autism are treated with behavioral therapy starting at a young age, and many will try multiple kinds of therapy or medications as they get older.
For their reviews, Warren and his colleagues collected data from all studies done in the last decade on the effectiveness of a range of medications and therapies in reducing symptoms of autism.
In their most convincing finding, the authors determined that secretin – a hormone otherwise used to treat stomach ulcers -- is not an effective treatment for kids with autism. Excitement about the drug started in the late 1990’s, when very limited evidence suggested it might promote social skills in kids with autism – but after more thorough research, it’s clear that’s not the case, Warren said.
That conclusion was based on 7 past studies that found the drug did not improve language or reasoning skills or any other autism symptoms.
The researchers found there was not enough evidence to determine whether anti-depressants such as Prozac and Celexa or the stimulant drug Ritalin might help kids with autism.
There is some evidence showing that both Risperdal and Abilify might help cut down on kids’ repetitive behaviors. But because both drugs may cause side effects such as uncontrolled muscle tremors and drowsiness, the authors said they should only be used in kids who are very impaired because of their autism.
Dr. Bryan King, the director of Seattle Children’s Autism Center, said that as many as 70 percent of kids with autism are treated with some kind of medication.
“The real take-home message for me…. is the striking disparity between the treatments that we use and the number of children that are receiving them, and the strength of the evidence that we have in support of these practices,” said King, who was not involved in the current study.
It is “hard to reconcile” the popularity of these drugs with the lack of information about their effectiveness, he told Reuters Health, but not having enough evidence isn’t the same thing as saying the drugs don’t work.
Warren and his colleagues concluded that intensive behavioral therapy or behavioral treatment started in very youngkids has helped some of them improve reasoning and language skills, as well as their ability to interact with others. It’s hard to know which kids will benefit from those therapies, however.
“Some (behavioral) interventions can show some pretty dramatic changes,” Warren said. “At the same time, understanding which specific treatments are going to be best for specific (kids) – we’re not quite there.”
King said it was time to “redouble our efforts” to gain more conclusive evidence on possible treatment options.
The research “just really highlights that we urgently need new treatments and better treatments, in addition to refining our understanding of how available treatments work for specific individuals and specific families,” Warren concluded.
By LINDSEY TANNER - AP Medical Writer | AP – 4 hrs ago
CHICAGO (AP) — A new study suggests nearly one in five children with an autistic older sibling will develop the disorder too — a rate much higher than previously thought.
Researchers followed 664 infants who had at least one older brother or sister with autism. Overall, 132 infants or about 19 percent ended up with an autism diagnosis, too, by their third birthdays. Previous smaller or less diverse studies reported a prevalence of between 3 percent and 14 percent.
"We were all a bit surprised and taken aback about how high it is," said lead author Sally Ozonoff, a psychiatry and behavioral sciences professor with the Mind Institute at the University of California at Davis.
The highest rates were in infants who had at least two older siblings with autism — 32 percent of them also developed autism. Also, among boys with autistic siblings — 26 percent developed autism versus 9 percent of girls. Autism is already known to be more common in boys.
The study involved 12 U.S. and Canadian sites and was published online Monday in Pediatrics. Earlier studies were more local or involved fewer sites.
Ozonoff said parents of autistic children often ask her, "How likely am I to have another child" with autism? She said her study provides a more up-to-date answer.
However, Ozonoff noted that 80 percent of siblings studied did not develop autism, and that the prevalence rate was an average. It may be different for each family, depending on other risk factors they may face.
Autism has no known cause but experts believe that genetics and external influences are involved. Research is examining whether these could include infections, pollution and other non-inherited problems. Ozonoff noted that siblings often are exposed to similar outside influences, which could partly explain the study results.
Infants in the study were enrolled before they showed any signs of autism, such as poor eye contact and little social interaction.
The study is an important addition to autism research and "has critical implications for families who are deciding whether they'll have another child," said Catherine Lord, director of the Institute for Brain Development at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center. Lord was not involved in the study.
Kathleen Lanese of Kings Park, N.Y., says having one son with autism didn't make her think twice about trying to have another child, even though she knew there was a chance the second would be affected, too.
"We wanted another child and we were going to take whoever we got," said Lanese, who was not involved in the study. Still, when her younger son was a baby, she says she "watched him like a hawk" for autism signs. He was diagnosed with autism at 16 months, earlier than her older boy.
Ozonoff said the study should prompt families and their children's doctors to be vigilant with infants whose older siblings have autism. Early diagnosis is important because experts say behavioral treatment has the best chance of working if started early.
"Pediatricians need to listen and make a very focused plan for how to monitor those things, rather than taking a wait-and-see attitude" toward children with autistic siblings, Ozonoff said.
Alycia Halladay, a research director at the advocacy group Autism Speaks, said the study provides a more robust, accurate prevalence estimate than previous studies, and strengthens the idea that family history is a risk factor.
Her group, the National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institute for Health Research are among those who paid for the study.
___
Online:
American Academy of Pediatrics: http://www.aap.org
National Institutes of Health: http://health.nih.gov/topic/Autism
____
AP Medical Writer Lindsey Tanner can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/LindseyTanner
AX is the oldest of the three sibling. He turned 10 years old. It seems like it was only yesterday. He is 10 years old and strong. He is getting stronger day by day. I thought that somehow or eventually, things will change. I am still hoping for a change or shall I say, adaption to the environment. There are times that I can not wait for something that will suddenly come on his way. He is a beautiful boy, very kind and patient. He has a big heart. He, however, can be so focused that the world around him has to stop to give space to his ticks. For more than a year now, he has been continuously so enthused in flushing toilets, washing his hands in the sink after using the bathroom when he really did not use it at all, rushing to a closed door and trying to find the key to it and removing the scuffs on the floor. He was not like this at all before. He had some obsessive compulsive mannerisms but will eventually fade away and replaced by a new one. This time, he became so tied up with something for a long time. He persists for as long as he can. He fights people as long as he does what "needs" to be done according to him.
Today, we visited Target. We have not gone to this store for a long time. We have Walmart where we can buy affordable items. It was a happy moment at first. His father asked him to count the neatly arranged fingers. Indeed, he counted. He knows that people have 10 fingers. Hence, we asked him to count the fingers of his father properly by pointing to the well-arranged fingers. He counted 9 fingers only. He was flabbergasted and went white with fear or puzzlement. He looked at the fingers of his father anew. He counted with his eyes. We began giggling when we saw that he was so deliriously quizzed to the max why his father has 9 fingers only. He grabbed the hands of his father and tried to look at the palm. His father tried to dissuade him. Later on, he grabbed the hands of his father. There he saw that his father stealthily kept the missing finger. AX was now smiling. He realized that somehow, he was tricked. He laughed with all of us.
We continued our shopping for food. We turned to furniture corner and I was looking at the tall chairs like the ones we have. In an instant, AX looked down and saw something that looks like dirt or stain on the shiny floor. He reached for it. I saw him and told him to stand up and must not remove scuffs on the floor. He reached down again and I tried my best not for him to do these awkward things. I do not want him doing these things because they make him look stupid. Removing scuffs on the floor is not healthy for him because later on when he finds that his hands are dirty, he will lick his hands/fingers. Another reason, it takes away the precious time when he should be doing more productive tasks to help him talk. He can think and he knows right from wrong. Yet, he has this big obsession that he has to remove scuffs on the floor.
We had like more than 5-minute struggle for him to get up because he let himself fall on the floor time after time. He was hitting us while fighting to get to his obsessive task. People who were shopping, I noticed, were looking at us like we were hurting him. It was an insane struggle in the first place but we can not let him do things that are counterproductive to his health and sanity. Removing scuffs on the floor is a counterproductive task.
In the end, his father was able to raise him up and moved him away. All the while, his younger sister and brother were looking at us. They know that AX was not doing something good. His brother was telling him that the floor is dirty. Yet, AX kicked, hit, fell on the floor, turned around on the floor, screamed, cried, pushed us just to reach the scuffs that he wanted to remove. He did not listen at all to us nor to his younger brother.
We left the area and paid for our groceries.
This reminds me, what else should we do in order to break him from this counterproductive habit. He is growing older and stronger. One day, we will not be able to maneuver him like we did today after a struggle. It is hard. It is frustrating. He is our child and as much as possible we want him to act normally. Why? In this world, many people are harsh. You are judged on what you do and not on what you can do. He has so many productive tasks on his hands yet removing scuffs on the floor is beyond that. We can not let him do that no matter what people will say. It is not safe for him.
Children with autism had reduced activity in specific brain regions. Photograph: Corbis
The pattern of brain activity in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is markedly different from that of children without the condition, according to a new brain-imaging study.
The work, which shows that ASD has a "signature" in the brain, may lead to a better understanding of which parts of the brain the condition interferes with and how some people, despite having a high genetic risk of developing the condition, manage to compensate for its effects.
ASD is a genetically influenced condition that affects the development of children's brains, with symptoms that include difficulties with social communication, interaction and imagination.
Dr Martha Kaiser and Professor Kevin Pelphrey of Yale University led a team of researchers that explored this idea by studying how children's brains responded to videos of people moving around them.
"As intrinsically social creatures, humans typically exhibit robust visual sensitivity to other people's movements," they write today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"This is well illustrated by the discovery that point-light displays (ie videos created by placing lights on the major joints of a person and filming them moving in the dark), although relatively impoverished stimuli, contain sufficient information to identify the kind of motion being produced (eg walking, dancing, reaching) as well as the identity of the agent."
Previous research found that two-year-olds with autism did not turn to face point-light displays of "biological motion".
In their study, Kaiser and Pelphrey placed 62 children aged from 4 to 17 years old into functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanners and monitored their brain activity as they watched a point-light display of biological motion and another of scrambled dots.
In the group, 25 children had ASD, 20 were the siblings of children with ASD but did not display any symptoms themselves, and the remainder were "typically developing" children.
The researchers identified three signatures of brain activity that corresponded to the different children's responses to the point-light displays.
Relative to the other groups, there was reduced activity in specific brain regions in children with ASD when they were watching biological motion compared with scrambled motion.
These included the right amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, areas which other research has identifed as having changed activity in adults with ASD.
The researchers found additional brain regions that showed reduced activity in both the siblings group and the ASD group, relative to the typically developing group.
They interpreted this result as a reflection of the underlying genetic vulnerability that the siblings group might have to ASD.
The scientists also found what they called "compensatory activity" in the siblings group – brain regions that were working harder than normal and might be helping the children overcome their increased genetic risk of ASD.
These included the right posterior temporal sulcus and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which have been implicated in social perception and social cognition.
"These regions might reflect the absence of additional genetic or environmental factors that confer risk for ASD," the researchers wrote.
"Alternatively, they could represent a process through which brain function was altered over development to compensate for an increased genetic risk to develop ASD."
Dorothy Bishop, a professor of developmental neuropsychology at Oxford University, said: "This is a potentially interesting study that looks for brain markers of underlying abnormality in children with autism in response to viewing dot patterns that indicate biological motion."
But she added: "More controversially, the authors also propose that other brain regions are under-responsive to biological motion in siblings of children with autism, as well as in those with autism.
"Yet other regions are reported to be overactive in the siblings, and this is interpreted as compensatory activity.
"Since these siblings had no subclinical symptoms of autism, and were selected to have no other relatives with any autistic features, they are unlikely to constitute a group with strong genetic risk for autism, and so this aspect of the results is puzzling and it would be important to replicate it in another sample."
The researchers themselves admitted that further studies would be needed to determine the precise functions of the "compensatory" brain activity that they had identified.
But if confirmed, they said, these could "represent important targets for treatments and provide a measure of the effectiveness of intervention, as well as a better understanding of the mechanisms through which successful treatments function".
IQ scores can't predict academic performances of autistic kids
2010-11-18 16:40:00
A new research has revealed that many children with autism spectrum disorders are academically more capable than their IQ scores would suggest.
In a study by researchers at the University of Washington, 90 percent of autistic children showed a discrepancy between their IQ score and their performance on reading, spelling and math tests.
"Academic achievement is a potential source of self-worth and source of feeling of mastery that people may not have realized is available to children with autism," said Annette Estes, research assistant professor at the UW's Autism Center.
Thirty students with autism spectrum disorders, aged 9, were considered for their study.
IQ scores in the general population reliably predict academic performance - as measured by standardized tests for word reading, spelling and basic number skills. But results of the study showed something else.
"What we found was astounding: 27 out of the 30 children - that's 90 percent - had discrepancies between their IQ score and scores on at least one of the academic achievement tests," Estes said.
"Some scored higher and some scored lower than what their IQ score would predict," she added.
The discrepancies were especially profound in spelling and word reading, the researchers report.
They also found a link between social skills and academic ability in school. Specifically, children who had higher social skills at age 6, including introducing themselves to others and a willingness to compromise and cooperate, had better word reading skills at age 9.
Estes said that future study would concentrate on whether or not these trends hold true in the classroom.
The study is published online in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. (ANI)
This is a very sad story that I have just read. CPS is all about making money and breaking the family. I just hope that there is an abrupt end to this and the family will be happier than ever once they are together. ==================
The day my kids were taken was a day I wish I could erase from my memory. My heart never ached so bad as I cried a thousand tears. Cps is suppose to protect children and not rip them away from loving homes. Later, I would soon find out about the cps corruption happening all over the world. How it's not based on the "Childs best interest" but the money incentives they receive. They get bonuses for each child they adopt out and an extra 2k for a special needs child. It's sick. Don't believe me? Do the research as I did.
I have three beautiful children. My oldest is 3yrs old. His name is James and recently got diagnosed with Autism w/ Average intelligence. I have always loved and cared for my kids since the day they were born. I knew my son, James, was different when he turned 1yrs old. He was behind developmentally in many ways. People kept saying, "Oh..its because he is a boy. They are slower" even though I knew something was "off". I immediately had him connected with VMRC to receive services in regards to Therapy which included speech therapy (when old enough), physical therapy (as he didn't walk yet), and overall therapy. They came to the home once per week until he was 2 1/2. As the months passed he improved significantly. However, there was still something wrong I felt. He didn't look me in the eyes that much. He was not very sociable at daycare. He did not say one word even though I was very consistent with him. I was involved with every therapy session and even continued the therapy after they left. As he was my son who deserved the best. Recently, after all the years I fought and advocated for him..he was finally diagnosed with Autism and transferred to an agency that specialized in it. By the end of this month he will turn 3yrs old and be aged out of their program and transferred to the school district. Worried because he needs the continued services and everything that can possibly be offered to him so he could have the best start. Worried because he isn't in my care. Worried because I know the person he is with doesn't care about him nor is he capable of providing him with what he needs. And this is where my story begins..
A cps report was made on Aug 11th, 2010 that I "locked my kids in their bedroom". Granted that was true but it was never neglect! I tried to explain to the cps worker that my son had Autism and the behaviors associated with it. I told her that I only did it during naptime/bedtime to protect my son as he "wanders" during the night. I explained that it started when I woke up one night and heard my son crying. I jumped out of bed and found him standing in the bathtub filled with cold water. As a mother, I freaked out and had to make sure that would never happen again and he would be safe during the night. I tried the gates. They didn't work. He knew how to hop over them or push them down. I tried the safety locks on the door handles. Didn't work. He knew how to push them down to where they would pop off. He has figured out every safety lock and how to undo it. Some people say Autism is a disability but I think the opposite. Even though my son can't talk, he is extremely smart. He can do things kids his age can't do. Mind you, this cps worker was young herself, probably fresh out of college, and had no kids herself.
Before I even locked the bedroom I did my research first. I found on many valid Autism Websites where professionals even suggested to "lock the bedroom door" during bedtime to protect them and keep them safe during the night. To make it to where you have quick access to the room in case of a fire. After reading that, I started locking the door ONLY during bedtime. Before that, I had to turn the lock around to the outside because on one occasion my son locked himself in his room (he knows how to lock and unlock doors). It took me 30 min just to unlock the door from the outside and get in. That's when I turned the lock to the outside (but didn't start locking the door at that point).
They noticed the scratches on my daughters cheeks and asked where they came from. I told them my son did it. He did it not knowing it would hurt her as he doesn't understand "Cause and effect" but does it out of frustration because he can't talk and gets frustrated when he can't communicate (in any way) on what he wants or what upsets him. I told them that I put him in time-out (which never works) every time he did it and explained in short words what he did wrong and how he has to be nice. I kept doing time-outs as I don't spank my kids. I explained that he only did it to her under supervision. It wasn't all the time either. He had his "days" and other days he was perfectly fine. The daycare he went to prior (for a long time) had a problem with him recently on that because he kept hurting the other toddlers and making some of them bleed (scratches). Parents started to complain. But then they were trying to say that it was classified as a "failure to protect" when that doesn't make any sense. So every parent with an Autistic child can't have a non-autistic child in the same house? Because that's how they make it seem.
They told me to keep the door open and gate up. I did. Even though I knew what my son would do. It was hard for me to even go to bed, not knowing if my son would be safe during the night. But I felt I had to "Comply" with cps. They wanted "different" alternatives.
If you guys want a laugh here was a few suggestions she said.
1) "Why don't you just take the door handle off completely"
I just told her I did it to protect my son and keep him from wondering and getting hurt during the night, if not killed. So taking off the door handle completely? You want to make it easier for him where then he just "swings" the door open? Seriously.
2) "Why don't you just stack 2 gates on top of each other in the door frame"
I told her my son new how to hop over gates and push them down. So even if I stacked them (which would serve NO purpose, I couldn't do it because at the time I was 39 weeks pregnant and a single mom, and it would be virtually impossible because a pressure mounted gate needs a ground to stand on) And my son would just push the bottom gate down and crawl under the one that was on top. Again, didn't make sense.
3) "Why don't you just lock the bathroom"
I told her again that my son KNEW how to UNLOCK and LOCK doors so locking the bathroom door wouldn't be of any use because he would know how to unlock it. Besides, that's not my point! Its the whole house! Its the bathroom, my room, the kitchen, counters, sliding glass door, stove, oven, front door, etc. She wasn't getting the big picture and obviously at this point, I knew she had not been listening to anything I was saying from the beginning.
But, I did find a different alternative. I bought a gate that was tall enough to where he couldn't hop over and strong enough to where he couldn't push down. CASE SOLVED! I bought a door handle with no lock on either side. BOTH INSTALLED DURING THE INVESTIGATION! That's what they wanted!!! My whole purpose of the locked bedroom door was to ensure that my son was safe during the night. That's it. Since I have a gate now; there is no reason to lock the bedroom door.
Ok. So here comes the social worker and cps worker on the following day. The social worker with this big proposal on the "case plan".
The social worker stated, "Madeline wants to close the case but we want you to do these "services" under family maintenance" Note: They said they were strictly VOLUNTARY so I felt I had a say in the matter. They wanted me to take:
Parenting classes Domestic Violence Assessment Mental Health Assessment
I gave them reasons why I felt I didn't need their services. Valid ones if that.
I didn't need parenting classes as I have been taking parenting classes since 2007 voluntarily on a weekly basis. I started taking them after I gave birth to my oldest son as I was a new mother, a young mother, and felt taking parenting classes would only benefit me and my son.
I didn't need a mental health assessment because I just got one done and I have had a mental health caseworker since 2007.
I didn't need a domestic violence assessment because it wasn't a current issue and something that happened years ago.
The cps worker kept saying this was a "parenting issue" and I fired back with "No. It's a safety issue. Not a parenting issue. I was protecting my son!!!". Later, I would read in a report made to the courts that I kept "minimizing the issue". I didn't minimize anything. I just explained to them why I had to lock the bedroom door during bedtime, as suggested by professionals.
Did they bother to do the research? No. Did they bother to call people who actually knew me and what kind of mother I was? No. They didn't do anything.
The next day my sons therapist was with him in his room doing a therapy session and my daughter was taking a nap on my bed (since she couldn't be in her crib because that's where James was, doing his therapy session, and it was too loud in there). Then there was a knock on the door. 4 people were outside. One of them I noticed, which was the cps worker. She had papers in her hand. She basically said they were there because they were going to take my kids and put them into custody. Tears started streaming down my cheeks at that point. I looked behind me and saw my son laughing as he enjoyed an activity the therapist was doing with him. I asked why they were taking them as I complied with everything they asked (for the exception of the "case plan"). Her response was..
"Honey..you didn't comply with the services"
"You mean the parenting classes, etc?" I ask
"Yes" she replies
An attorney general was there also and said "Don't make this hard".
I can't even explain how hard it is to look your kids in the eyes and know they are going to be ripped from your arms. I had to "Gather" their clothes and some toys. I had to wake up my daughter and my sons' therapy session got interrupted. He had such a scared/confused look on his face and I just cried so hard. I held him so tight, not wanting to let go.
"Where is my son going?" I ask
"To his dads house" they reply
"No! You can't do that! His dad was never involved and never cared about him! He is a complete stranger to my son! You can't do that to him!"
"Well..he is the father" they reply
Did they care that Autistic children don't do well with change? Did they care how they need stability? Did they care how negatively this will affect my son as I am the only person he has known and loved. This is the only home he knows! They didn't even care that they were going to separate two siblings that loved each other so much. They didn't care that they were going to take away two kids that loved their mother so much and how I would die for them. My kids are my life. They are the air that I breath. This was just their "job" and obviously they didn't do it well. All they care about is that paycheck and not the kids.
My journey from that point out has been living HELL.
I was assigned a court appointed attorney that didn't do a damn thing to help my case! I cried so hard after doing my research about the corruption of cps..knowing that if I kept my court appointed attorney..I would never get my kids back. Found out that court appointed attorneys are actually "Friends" with cps. How they work "together".
A friend that I have, miraculously forked over the money (thousands) to pay for a private attorney for me. That was a miracle beyond anything.
Two weeks later, I gave birth to my son. Previously, I kept asking cps if they knew anything on if this one would be taken too. "I don't know" they reply. THEY ALL KNEW! You don't know yet you want me NOT to deliver at home? Yea..I'm not stupid. I had no choice. I had to deliver at the hospital because I had Step B and had to get antibiotics during labor so my son wouldn't get really ill after birth. My doctor had to induce me as I was almost 2 weeks post my EDD.
As always, when my son was born..I was so happy. Crying because he was so handsome and I loved him so much. I was currently grieving over the fact that my two kids got illegally taken from my home yet celebrating the birth of my son.
On the second day, his pediatrician came into my room. He said, "I tried to discharge you but an alert came up saying to "hold" the discharge until a social worker came and talked to me". Talked to me? Really? Is THAT what you guys call it? I waited for two hrs for him to come. I held my son for every minute. He came and basically said, "You have to sign this to give permission to put your son into custody"
"Why?" I ask. He has no relevancy to why my other two were taken (which there was a never a reason to why they were taken).
"Well..its because your other two recently got taken away and it wouldn't make sense for us to not take this one away"
he paused..for awhile..as I cried..
"Please sign this because if you don't..I'm going to have to call the cops"
(CPS is NOT to suppose to make threats and he did. This was another thing they violated along with many other laws they broke during this whole thing)
I just cried so hard. It was bad enough that my other two got taken..god..it was hell..still is. Now they were about to take this one too...for no valid reason at all.
All in all, they took him too.
Knowing this MIGHT happen..and knowing how bad foster homes can be..I pre-planned the placement. My friend, whom I have known for years, recently got finger printed, etc and was approved to take care of my daughter (until I get them back) and she was willing to take care of my newest son as she wanted (my friend) to keep them together and so he wouldn't end up in a foster home. So..two of my kids..are with my friend as my oldest (the one who has Autism) is with a dad that was never involved and never cared.
Visits with my son are horrible. Not the actual visit but how I sit in the waiting room and I have to watch his dad, his dad's gf, and my son sit right in front of me. I have to sit there and watch what my sons dad does to him right before my eyes. How when my son tries to play with the toys in the waiting room..he holds him by the arm at all times (near the shoulder). I just want to yell, "LET HIM GO!" god. He can't even play freely? My son just wanted to play with toys and he wouldn't let him. My son wanted to come toward me and he forced him back and restrained him on his lap while my son cried. How on another occasion I had my daughter with me in the waiting area (my friend met me in the parking lot so I walked in with them). My daughter recognized my son. She misses him so much. She wanted to go up to him to play. However, his dad wouldn't let go of him. "Not now, James". He is the one that needs parenting classes! He forced him back again. On a recent visit I had with my son, I led him out to the waiting room as that's where his "Dad" was waiting. I bent down to his level and told him how much I loved him and that I will see him next week. He kissed me on the cheek. The hardest thing was to let go of his hand knowing he he going back to a person that doesn't care for him or love him and having no say in the matter. My son ran to the left (opposite of where his dad was..he was running away from him) and his dad forced him back. It just kills me. My son also has eczema. Had it since he was 2 months old. Its not hard to treat! All you do is put hydrocordizone cream on it and Aveeno Baby lotion as it has oatmeal in it. Yet, at visits..I see scabs on his ankles/legs. That happens when excema isn't properly treated. Or in this case, not treated at all. I know how bad he can itch and be in pain because of it. I know that his dad isn't doing anything about it either.
The biggest thing that brings me to tears is seeing my son regressing. He used to be so happy, active, energetic, and was so outspoken (even though he couldn't talk..he babbled to no end). Now..He is so quiet, doesn't laugh, barely smiles, and keeps to himself. I look at him and I don't see the son I have raised and loved. When you look in his eyes its like looking into a dark hole. Cps noticed and said, "Oh its probably because of his diagnosis" YOU guys don't know ANYTHING about his diagnosis. If you did, they would have not been taken! The way he is now is because you placed him in a home and with people he doesn't know and who don't care about him!
My sons dad isn't "right" in the head either. All he does is play video goes, has a mental capacity of a 6th grader, wiccan, etc. Even cps is catching on to this.
There is SOOO much more to this and I really want to do a Part 2 to my story.
All in all, my kids should have never been taken. I never neglected them and only protected my son. I will fight this until my kids come home. I will bring this to the media even.
I even called the executive director at an agency that specializes in Autism and told her my story. I told her about the "locked bedroom door" and how cps classified that as "neglect". She was floored! She said that was in no way neglect. How there had to be SOMETHING ELSE on the report. I said, "no! That's the main staple!". "Well..they can't do that! That is a safety measure many parents have to take to protect their Autistic kids from wondering" she says. "Well..they did..and now I have to defend this in court" I reply. She is on the list of people that are going to be subpoenaed to testify.
